首页> 外文OA文献 >Forgetting Fire: Traditional Fire Knowledge in Two Chestnut Forest Ecosystems of the Iberian Peninsula and its Implications for European Fire Management Policy
【2h】

Forgetting Fire: Traditional Fire Knowledge in Two Chestnut Forest Ecosystems of the Iberian Peninsula and its Implications for European Fire Management Policy

机译:忘火:伊比利亚半岛两个板栗森林生态系统中的传统火灾知识及其对欧洲火灾管理政策的启示

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Human beings have used fire as an ecosystem management tool for thousands of years. In the context of the scientific and policy debate surrounding potential climate change adaptation and mitigation strategies, the importance of the impact of relatively recent state fire-exclusion policies on fire regimes has been debated. To provide empirical evidence to this ongoing debate we examine the impacts of state fire-exclusion policies in the chestnut forest ecosystems of two geographically neighbouring municipalities in central Spain, Casillas and Rozas de Puerto Real. Extending the concept of ‘Traditional Ecological Knowledge’ to include the use of fire as a management tool as ‘Traditional Fire Knowledge’ (TFK), we take a mixed-methods and interdisciplinary approach to argue that currently observed differences between the municipalities are useful for considering the characteristics of “pre-industrial anthropogenic fire regimes” and their impact on chestnut forest ecosystems. We do this by examining how responses from interviews and questionnaire surveys of local inhabitants about TFK in the past and present correspond to the current biophysical landscape state and recent fire activity (based on data from dendrochronological analysis, aerial photography and official fire statistics). We then discuss the broader implications of TFK decline for future fire management policies across Europe particularly in light of the published results of the EU sponsored Fire Paradox research project. In locations where TFK-based “pre-industrial anthropogenic fire regimes” still exist, ecosystem management strategies for adaptation and mitigation to climate change could be conceivably implemented at a minimal economic and political cost to the state by local communities that have both the TFK and the adequate social, economic and cultural incentives to use it.
机译:人类使用火作为生态系统管理工具已有数千年的历史了。在围绕潜在的气候变化适应和缓解策略的科学和政策辩论的背景下,已经讨论了相对较新的州防火法规对火灾状况的影响的重要性。为了为正在进行的辩论提供经验证据,我们研究了国家防火政策对西班牙中部两个地理邻近城市卡西利亚斯和雷亚尔·雷亚尔·雷亚尔的板栗森林生态系统的影响。扩展“传统生态知识”的概念以包括将火灾作为“传统火灾知识”(TFK)的管理工具,我们采用一种混合方法和跨学科的方法,认为当前观察到的市政当局之间的差异对考虑“工业化前人为火灾制度”的特征及其对板栗森林生态系统的影响。我们通过检查过去和现在当地居民对TFK的访谈和问卷调查的答复如何与当前的生物物理景观状态和最近的火灾活动相对应(基于树状年代学分析,航空摄影和官方火灾统计数据)来做到这一点。然后,我们将讨论TFK下降对整个欧洲未来消防管理政策的更广泛影响,尤其是根据欧盟赞助的Fire Paradox研究项目的已发布结果。在仍然存在基于TFK的“工业前人为火灾制度”的地区,可以想象到,同时拥有TFK和TFK的地方社区可以以最小的经济和政治成本为国家实施生态系统管理策略,以适应和缓解气候变化。充分的社会,经济和文化动力来使用它。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号